Skip to content

New Postcolonialisms: Literary Perspectives from Canada and Brazil


Postcolonial studies works at “the intersection between intervention and representation” (Slater 224)

Let’s consider the implications of this statement for understanding some of the ways in which literary and postcolonial studies enrich each other within postcolonial literary studies in English. If we accept this characterization of postcolonial studies, as I do, then what are the implications of such an approach for the practice of literary interpretation? After defining my terms, and introducing some of the range of new postcolonialisms now under development, I will argue that postcolonial critique would benefit from fuller engagement with perspectives from Canada and Brazil. Postcolonial theory recognizes what Kamau Brathwaite calls “the terrible terms meted out for universality” (20)—that is, that hegemonic knowledge claims about universality have tended to deny their situatedness within a particular local reality, mistaking the particular for the universal. Yet postcolonial theory itself is not always immune to such a danger. For different reasons and in different ways, both Canada and Brazil have been marginalized within mainstream postcolonial theory. The growing exchanges between literary critics in our two countries is helping to reorient postcolonial studies’ more general turn toward an expanded dialogue with the Americas, and with the challenges of globalizing processes.These perspectives hold potential to change the questions that postcolonial critics ask about texts, and to change the nature of theorizing itself. Instead of accepting a framework that opposes universal to particular, I will argue that attending to the situatedness of all research provides an orientation that bypasses these oppositions to provide a different way of thinking about knowledge as deriving from multiple locations.

Uberlandia Keynote Address. November 23, 2011 Online advance pdf

Works Cited

Aboriginal Healing Foundation.

Andrade, Oswald de. “Cannibalist Manifesto” In Brydon, ed. Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts. Vol 3. London: Routledge, 2000. 409-417.

Appadurai, Arjun. “Grassroots Imagination and the Research Imagination.” Public Culture. 12.1.2000: 1-19.

Arac, Jonathan. “Global and Babel: Language and Planet in American Literature.” In Dimock and Buell. 19-38.

Blaser, Mario, Ravi de Coasta, Deborah McGregor, and William D. Coleman, eds. Indigenous Peoples and Autonomy: Insights for a Global Age. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2010.

Brathwaite, Kamau. History of the Voice. London: New Beacon, 1984.

Brodber, Erna. Myal. London: New Beacon, 1988.

Brydon, Diana.  “Introduction.” In Diana Brydon, ed. Postcolonialism: Critical Concepts. Vol.1. London: Routledge, 2000: 1-26.

—. “Global Designs, Postcolonial Critiques: Rethinking Canadain Dialogue with Diaspora.“ Ilha do Desterro (Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina). Special Issue: “Postcolonial Cultures in Contact: Bras(z)il/Canada(Á).” 40. Jan./Jun. 2001: 61-84.

Butler, Judith and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Who Sings the Nation-State? Language, Politics, Belonging. London: Seagull, 2007.

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

Clarke, George Elliott. “Literature.” English Studies in Canada. 30.4 (2004): 40-43.

Coronil, Fernando. “Elephants in the Americas? Latin American Postcolonial Studies and Global Decolonization.” In Morana, Mabel, Enrique Dussel, and Carolos A. Jauregui, eds. Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008. 396-416.

Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices.

Dangarembga, Tsistsi. Nervous Conditions. London: Women’s Press, 1988.

—.  The Book of Not. Oxfordshire: Ayebia Clarke, 2006.

De Costa, Ravi. “Afterword” in Blaser et al (2010): 241-249.

Dimock, Wai Chee. Through Other Continents. Princeton: Prinecton UP, 2006.

Escobar, Arturo. “Afterword” In Walter D. Mignolo and Arturo Escobar, eds. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. London: Routledge, 2010. 391-399.

Erasmus, George. “Introduction.” In Mathur et al. vii-x.

Findlay, Len. “Always Indigenize! The Radical Humanities in the Postcolonial Canadian University.” Ariel. 31. 1-2 (2000): 307-26.

—. “Determination, Determinations, and Dissemination.” English Studies in Canada. 30.3 (2004): 1-3.

Ghosh, Amitav. In An Antique Land. 1992; London: Granta, 1998.

Highway, Tomson.Kiss of the Fur Queen. Toronto: Doubleday, 1998.

Huhndorf, Shari.“Indigeneity, Colonialism, and Literary Studies: A ‘Transdisciplinary, Oppositional Politics of Reading.” English Studies in Canada. 30.2 (2004): 29-38.

Marchant, Elizabeth A. “National Space as Minor Space: Afro-Brazilian Culture and the Pelourinho.” In Lionnet, Francoise and Shu-mei Shih, eds. Minor Transnationalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005. 301-316.

Mathur, Ashok, Jonathan Dewar, and Mike DeGagné, eds. Cultivating Canada: Reconciliation through the Lens of Cultural Diversity. Ottawa: Aboriginal Healing Foundation Research Series, 2011.

Mathur, Ashok. “”Cultivations, Land, and a Politics of Becoming.” In Mathur et al. 3-10.

Menezes de Souza, Lynn Mario Trinidade. “Remapping Writing: Indigenous Writing and Cultural Conflict in Brazil.” English Studies in Canada. 30.3 (2004): 4-16.

Mignolo, Walter D. and Arturo Escobar, ed. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. London: Routledge, 2010.

Oloff, Kerstin D. “Wilson Harris, Regionalism and Postcolonial Studies” In Niblett, Michael and Kerstin Oloff, eds. Perspectives on the ‘Other America’: Comparatrive Approaches to Caribbean and Latin American Culture. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009. 233-256.

Slater, David. (2004). Geopolitics and the Post-colonial: Rethinking North-South Relations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.

—. Nationalism and the Imagination. London: Seagull, 2010.

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.

Wilson, Janet, Cristina Sandru, Sarah Lawson Welsh, eds. Rerouting the Postcolonial: New Directions for the New Millennium. London: Routledge, 2010.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: