Autonomy, Transnational Literacies, and Planetarity: Emergent Cultural Imaginaries of Research Engagement
This paper introduces my engagements with cultural studies as an interdisciplinary and collaborative activity devoted to understanding how people make meanings within different cultural contexts under changing historical and economic pressures. I will argue that how communities imagine the spaces open to their agency is crucial in shaping the futures we can devise. The work conducted under the auspices of my Canada Research Chair in Globalization and Cultural Studies is shaped by my formation within postcolonial studies, understood as a decolonizing project linking cognitive and social justice. I speak from that location today.
I begin with this premise: The project set out in postcolonial studies has not been realized, in either the academy or in the world beyond academia. Effective decolonization of the imagination has yet to be achieved. Internal disputes pitting theory against practice, university work against political work, or resistance against complicity, miss the potential of postcolonial thinking to recast these relations within a different mold. It is easier now to see that these arenas, once understood as separate, are actually connected. But the potentially transformative impact of postcolonial thinking has yet to be felt. Globalization is superseding colonialism/imperialism as an interpretative frame, but many thinkers remain wedded to older frameworks. Gurminder Bhambra argues persuasively that sociology has failed to transform its categories and the structures of its investigations in response to postcolonial critique. Malreddy Pavan Kumar concludes that “a neo-assimilatory process is already underway as most mainstream disciplines (sociology, psychology) list postcolonialism as just another methodology in their respective disciplinary traditions” (669). Most assessments concur: postcolonial critique has had an additive impact, enlarging the scope of disciplinary investigations without achieving a fully transformative impact. Amin Alhassen, in contrast, argues that the postcolonial perspectives that Communications Studies relegates to its margins have actually been at its centre all along but only as an unacknowledged influence (110) and a “structuring absence” (115). His argument requires closer attention but does not substantially alter the general conclusion to be drawn. The research imagination has yet to be “deparochialized” (Appadruai 2000; 2007). “Cognitive justice” has yet to be achieved (Santos)
Address to Canadian Association of Cultural Studies November 2011Consult the online advance pdf at this url http://myuminfo.umanitoba.ca/Documents/4266/BrydonCACS11.pdf
excerpt “As part of my university’s homecoming celebrations this year, I was asked to speak along with several colleagues at the first of our year-long series of “visionary conversations” called “Apocalypse or Utopia”. Each of us was given five minutes to introduce one of the university’s strategic themes in an evening designed to engage the educated general public. My assignment was “Culture and Creativity.” My talk tried to complicate these concepts and especially to suggest that it may not be helpful to cast our choices in such starkly messianic terms. The concepts I offer today bypass both apocalypse and utopia.”
Visionary Conversations: Culture and Creativity
Alhassen, Amin. (2007). “The Canonic Economy of Communication and Culture: The Centrality of the Postcolonial Margins” Canadian Journal of Communication. 32. 103-118.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2007). “Sociology and Postcoloni8alism: Another ‘Missing’ Revolution?” Sociology. 41.5: 871-884.
Birns, Nicholas (2010). Theory After Theory: An Intellectual History of Literary Theory from 1950 to the Early Twenty-First Century. Peterborough: Broadvidew.
Brydon, Diana. “Competing Autonomy Claims and the Changing Grammar of Global Politics.” Globalizations. vol.6. no.3 (Sept 2009): 339-352.
—. “Critical Literacies for Globalizing Times.” Critical Literacy, Special Issue: Theories and Practices. 4:2, June 2010. 16-28. www.criticalliteracyjournal.org
“Earth, World, Planet: Where does the Postcolonial Literary Critic Stand?” In Cultural Transformations: Perspectives on Translocation in a Global Age, ed. Chris Prentice, Henry Johnson, and Vijay Devadas. Rodopi, 2010. 3-29.
Brydon, Diana and W. D. Coleman, ed. (2008) Renegotiating Community: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Global Contexts. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Cetina, Karin Knorr. (2007) “Culture in Global Knowledge Societies: Knowledge Cultures and Epistemic Cultures.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 32.4: 361-75.
Clifford, “Indigenous Articulations” In Wilson, R and C.L Connery, eds. The Worlding Project: Doing Cultural Studies in the Era of Globalization. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 2007. 13-38.
Code, Lorraine. (2000) “The Perversion of Autonomy and the Subjection of Women: discourses of social advocacy at century’s end,” in C. Mackenzie and N. Stoljar, eds. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 181-209.
Dimock, Wai Chee.(2006) Through Other Continents. Princeton: Princeton UP.
During, Simon. (2005) Cultural Studies: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Featherstone, Simon. (2005) Postcolonial Cultures. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press and University Press of Mississippi.
Friedman, Susan Stanford. (2010) “Planetarity: Musing Modernist Studies.” MODERNISM / modernity. 17.3: 471-99.
Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar (2002) “Toward New Imaginaries: An Introduction.” Public Culture. 14.1: 1-19.
Ghai, Yash. (2000) “Ethnicity and Autonomy: a framework for analysis” In Yash Gai, ed. Autonomy and Ethnicity: Negotiating Competing Claims in Multi-ethnic States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 415-440.
Gilroy, Paul. (2005) “A New Cosmopolitanism” Interventions 7.3: 287-292.
Grossberg, Lawrence. (2010) Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Gunkel, Ann Hetzel. (2011) “On Cultural Studies in the Future Tense: Pedagogy and Political Work in Cultural Studies.” Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies. 8.3. 323-329.
Heise, Ursula K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jefferess, David. (2008) Postcolonial Resistance: Culture, Liberation, and Transformation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Lee, Ezra Yoo-Hyeok. (2011) “Globalization, Pedagogical Imagination, and Transnational Literacy,” CLC Web: Comparative Literature and Culture. 13.1. 1-12. http://doc.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol13/iss1/1
Levander, Caroline and Walter Mignolo. (2011) “Introduction: The Global South and World Dis/Order” The Global South. 5.1.1-11.
Ostler, Nicholas. (2010) The Last Lingua Franca: English until the Return of Babel. New York: Walker & Co.
Pavan Kumar, Malreddy. (2011) “Postcolonialism: interdisciplinary or interdiscursive?” Third World Quarterly. 32.4. 653-672.
Rethmann, Petra, Imre Szeman, and William D. Coleman (2010) Cultural Autonomy: Frictions and Connections. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. (2003). Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
—. (1990) The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues, ed. Sarah Harasym. New York: Routledge.
—. (2006) “World Systems and the Creole.” Narrative. 14.6: 102-12.
—. (2010) Nationalism and the Imagination. London: Seagull Books.
—. (2011). “Response.” Parallax. 17.3: 98-104.
Staten, Henry (2005) “Tracking the ‘Native Informant’: Cultural Translation as the Horizon of Literary Translation” In Bermann, Sandra and Michael Wood, eds. Nation, Language, and the Ethics of Translation. P;rinceton: Princeton University Press. 111-126.
Young, Robert J.C. (2011). “The Right to Resist.” In Oboe, Annalisa and Shaul Bassi, eds. Experiences of Freedom in Postcolonial Literatures and Cultures. Abingdon: Routledge. 43-58.